Serbs believed that someone from the family will soon die after they move into the new house, cause each house needs a protective spirit. To prevent this, a cockerel (ritual replacement for a human) was killed on the doorstep (the seat of the dead).
Another ritual performed to provide the guardian spirit for the house is the ritual trapping of someone's (usually unsuspecting passerby, not someone from the family) shadow into the stone foundations of a new house by the house builders.
I also talked about this in my post "Blood and mortar" about sacrifices made to make the building stand in Slavic lands (areas where Slavs still or once used to live) of the Balkans...
The legend found in Hungary, Romania, Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Albania, Pontic Turkey talks about brothers (or a single builder) building a church, fortress, bridge. Whatever they build during the day was magically destroyed during the night, until one of the builders sacrficed his wife by building her into the foundations or walls of whatever was buing built.
Serbian Saint Tsar Lazar fresco from Curtea de Arges Monastery, Romania, one of the buildings which could only be built after a human sacrifice...
In this post I want to present some other examples of foundational human sacrifices from around the world.
Starting with:
According to Plutarch: Romulus and Remus quarreled over the location of the Imperial city. When they could not agree upon the site for the city, their dispute was referred to the decision of augury, and was decided m favor of Romulus, who was proceeding to open a ditch where the walls were to be built, when his brother, angered by the adverse decision of the augury, obstructed the work. He finally attempted to leap over the ditch to show his contempt for it, and fell in, or "as some say, he fell by the hands of Romulus". He was then buried by Romulus, in Remonia, which was the location on Mount Aventine chosen by Remus for the city...
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies...
During the wars of the Lacedaemonians and the Messenians when continued reverses and expenditures had brought the affairs of the latter into a deplorable condition, with the desertion of their slaves and a pestilence upon them, they resolved to abandon their towns in the interior and move to the mountains. They selected for their future home the small town which Homer had characterised as "rocky Ithome." They sent an envoy to Delphi in order to learn the will of the gods, and were commanded by the oracle to sacrifice a pure virgin (selected by lot out of the family of the ^Epytidae) at night to the gods below.
The ancient Greek city built by returning Messenians around Mount Ithome was Ancient Messene...
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies...
The builders of Antioch, had a girl sacrificed at their foundation. The 22d of May was set apart as the anniversary of this sacrifice. This virgin sacrificed at the foundation was afterwards worshiped as the fortune of the town.
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies...
At Laodicea the annual sacrifice of a stag that stood for a maiden, and was offered to the goddess of the city, stands side by side with the legend that the goddess was a maiden, who had been sacrificed to consecrate the foundation of the town, and was thenceforth worshiped as its fortune.
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies...
Levant
There is a very old textual tradition concerning foundation sacrifice. The biblical passage concerning Jericho says: “Cursed be the man before the LORD, that riseth up and buildeth this city Jericho: he shall lay the foundation thereof in his firstborn…” (Joshua 6:26)
In I. Kings xvi. 34, we can read "With Abiram his first-born he founded herand with Segub his youngest he set up her gates, according to the word of Yahwe through Joshua bin Nun." The idea of a curse being pronounced against the builder is not contained in it. There is nothing to show that the offering of the builder's sons was in the nature of a punishment.
Archaeology at Jericho has also produced human remains associated with architectural structures, although interpreting those remains specifically as sacrifices is disputed...
Also, the Hebrew word meaning "son" is derived from the Hebrew root meaning to build, to erect, to construct, according to Gesenius, as quoted by Mr. William Simpson, who raises the question whether the sacrifice of the first born was a foundation rite...
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies...
We find this ritual foundational death at the root of Christianity.
Christ was the corner stone and the apostles the foundation stones of the Church.
Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious, . . . the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner.
An old hymn for the dedication of a church says:
Christ is made the sure foundation
And the precious corner stone,
Who, the twofold walls uniting,
Binds them closely into one.
We find traces of foundational sacrifices in British Isles too.
England
In the year 1876, the old church at Brownsover, Warwickshire, was restored; the earlier parts of the building were of Norman, the latter of early thirteenth century architecture. The church stands upon the site of an early British entrenchment about two miles from Rugby, and two from the Roman station on the Watling street road. It was found necessary to lower the foundations of the north and south walls of the church; and in doing so two skeletons were discovered, one under the north, the other under the south wall—about one foot below the original foundations—exactly opposite to each other and about six feet from the chancel wall which crosses the north and south wall of the church at right angles. Each skeleton was covered with an oak slab about six feet in length by ten inches wide and two inches thick—of the colour of bog oak; these pieces of oak plank had evidently been used as carpenters' benches from the fact that each of them had four mortice-holes cut in them in such a form as to throw the legs outwards, and from the cuts made in them by edged tools. The skeletons were found in a space cut out of the solid clay which had not been moved, on either side, and just large enough to take the bodies placed in them. The skeletons were seen in situ; they could not have been placed there after the original walls had been built.
In 1881 the chancel of Hope Church in Derbyshire, fourteen miles from Sheffield, was pulled down...Apparently...there were no foundations, in the ordinary sense of the term. The walls were simply built on the surface of the ground, as was found to be the case during the late restorations at Rotherham and Sheffield Parish churches. The wonder is how such massive piles stood with so imperfect a bearing. But at Hope there was in one sense, and in two places, a foundation. Under the north wall and under the south wall, where these joined the nave of the church, were placed, face upwards, two massive ancient gravestones, and on these the walls were built...It seems that...the slabs at Hope...were expressly made for the purpose of being laid beneath the foundations, or of covering bodies laid beneath the foundations. But the evidence in this case is too imperfect to allow the inference that the walls of this chancel were built on the bodies of human beings sacrificed to ensure the stability of the building, for it does not appear whether bodies were found beneath the stones or not. In the absence of afhial sacrifice we may nevertheless conclude that the slabs were purposely laid under the walls in accordance with custom or ritual, for the symbols of sacrifice would survive after the more barbarous rite had ceased to exist. It should be mentioned that the Doomsday Book records a church at Hope...
In 1885 Holsworthy Parish Church was restored, and in the course of restoration the south-west angle wall of the church was taken down. In it, embedded in the mortar and stone, was found a skeleton. The wall of this portion of the church was faulty, and had settled. According to the account given by the masons who found the ghastly remains, there was no trace of a tomb, but every appearance of the person having been buried alive, and hurriedly. A mass of mortar was over the mouth, and the stones were huddled about the corpse as though hastily heaped about it, then the wall was leisurely proceeded with...
During the restoration of the church at Treeton in Hallamshire in 1892, under the supervision of Charles Hadfield, Esq., of Sheffield, architect, a child's stone coffin was found in a remarkable position. It appears that the wall of the south aisle was of great age—it was probably the oldest part of the building—and this wall, owing to its tottering and 'unsafe condition, had to be removed and rebuilt. The removal was effected by Mr. George Webster, the builder and contractor, and from him and from Mr. Hadfield I have received the following account of the discovery of this little coffin. It was found about twelve inches below the surface of the ground, and in the foundation of the old wall. It lay on its side lengthwise, with the hollow part facing the inside of the church, and with the head eastwards and close to the buttress of the Brampton Chapel. It had no lid or covering, and Mr. Webster informs me that there were no bones therein, but that it was "filled with dirt." The coffin, which is figured in the drawing, is now placed inside the porch of the south aisle, on the west wall of the porch, with the cavity facing outwards. Its interior measurements are: length thirty inches, length to the shoulders twenty-three inches, extreme breadth six-and-three-quarter inches, breadth in the narrowest part three-and-three-quarter inches, depth four inches. A piece of one of the sides of the coffin has been broken off, and it may have lost a little of its original depth owing to its having been trimmed by the mason so as to fit its new position in the porch. Such a little coffin could only have contained the body of a child of about a year old, and the thought of the horrible and cruel rite of which it is an appalling witness may well bring tears to the eyes. The position in which the coffin was originally placed shows either that a child was built in alive to ensure the stability of the wall or of the church, or else that an empty coffin was laid in by way of symbol of the ancient sacrifice.[5] The fact that the coffin was "filled with dirt," without containing bones, would seem to point to the conclusion that it was laid in merely as a symbol, but on the other hand we must remember that as the coffin was without lid its contents would be more freely exposed to the dissolving earth. The church, moreover, is very old, and a church at Treeton is mentioned in the Doomsday Survey. In so long a period the bones of a little child would hardly escape dissolution, and all that can be said is that there is no evidence whether the coffin was placed there as a symbol of the foundation sacrifice, or whether a child was actually buried there alive. But one of these two things must have happened, and if such sacrifices had ceased to be made at the time when the church was built, the position of the coffin nevertheless shows that children were once built in alive in England to ensure the stability of churches or other buildings.
You can read more about it in Strange Survivals: Some Chapters in the History of Man
Ireland
During the 19th century, antiquarians excavated the interiors of several Irish round towers and frequently found human skeletons buried beneath the foundations...
Scotland
According to the Iona tradition, St Columba's builders repeatedly constructed a chapel only to find the work destroyed by the following morning. A divine message eventually instructed them that one of the monks had to be buried alive beneath the foundations. St Oran volunteered and was buried beneath the chapel which is today known as St Oran's chapel.
You can read more about it here...
Wales
In Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae we read that Vortigern was trying to build a tower, but, the foundations laid each day are swallowed up by the earth. His magicians therefore advise him to find a fatherless boy and sacrifice him, pouring his blood over the foundations. The boy was Merlin, who instead exposed the real cause: a pool of water beneath the foundations...
Pic: Roman de Brut - Vortigern Tower
Germany
In his Teutonic Mythology, Grimm talks about numerous human sacrifices that were once performed in Germany to secure various buildings from collapsing.
To make Liebenstein Castle (pic) impregnable, there was walled-in a child, whom its mother for base gold had parted with; while the masons were at work, says the story, it sat eating a roll and calling out, 'Mother, I can see you,' then, 'Mother, I see a little of you still,' and when the last stone was let in, 'Mother, I see nothing of you now.' In the outer wall of Reichenfels Castle a child was built in alive: a projecting stone marks the spot, and if that were pulled out, the wall would tumble down at once...
When the new bridge at Halle, finished 1843, was being built, the common people fancied a child was wanted to be walled into the foundations...
A young lady was built into the wall of Meder-Manderscheid with an opening left, through which she was fed as long as she was able to eat, according to tradition, and in 1844, the wall was broken through and a cavity in which was a human skeleton was actually discovered...
The reason assigned for the great strength of the tower of Winneberg is that a child of the master-mason was built into the wall...
It is also believed a child was built in alive in the outer wall of Reichenfells Castle, and that a projecting stone marks the spot, and if that were pulled out, the wall would tumble down at once.
The village authorities bought a child of a poor motherand built it alive into the foundations of the church at Blex in Oldenburg and in 1615, Count Anthony Gunther of Oldenburg rescued an infant child that the workmen were about to bury under a dyke which they were repairing; yet tradition says that this same Count buried a living child in the foundations of his own castle...
A boy named Hugo was sunk alive in the foundation when a portion of the dyke gave way at Butjadeirgen...
Two children were immured in the basement of the wall of Sandel; and one in that of Ganderkesee...
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies...
Denmark
It is said that many years ago, when the ramparts were being raised around Copenhagen, it was impossible to make the walls stand firm till they took a little innocent girl, placed her in a chair by a table and gave her playthings and sweetmeats, and while she was thus enjoying herself, twelve masons built an arch over her which they covered with earth to the sound of drums and trumpets.
You can read more about this in Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophi, religion, art and custom...
Baltic
This is the Gothic-style single-nave Jõhvi Fortress Church from Estonia. According to a legend, everything the workers built during the day was turned into rubble by Satan at night and even sank underground, until a person was found who allowed himself to be walled up alive in the church wall...
You can read more about this here...
Russia
According to folklore recorded in 19th-century studies of comparative mythology, Detinets, the Old Russian word for a central city fortress, also known as Kremlin, has a root in the Slavic word for child (dijete / deti). This is because, according to the legends, when a fortress (Detinets) was built, local builders would send out scouts to capture the very first child they encountered. The captured child was then said to be walled alive into the foundations of the town or fortress to appease spirits and secure the stability of the walls.
Official etymology says that the term Detinets comes from the Russian word for the Retinue (Deti), and designated the part of the fortress which housed the prince’s junior military retinue, often referred to metaphorically as the "children" (deti) of the ruler or defenders of the fort. Or that it comes from the word det’ meaning "to put" or "to shelter", as Detinets was the secure, innermost part of the town where young children and the elderly were placed during enemy sieges.
Pic: Novgorod Detinets
Ukraine
At Subotiv in Ukraine, excavators discovered the skeleton of a teenager associated with the construction of a rampart. The researchers explicitly describe it as a "building sacrifice". Radiocarbon dating gives approximately 834–807 BC.
You can read more about it here...
Georgia
According to ancient legend linked to the Surami fortress, the fortress was crumbling apart overnight every time its construction was finished, and a local fortune-teller said that someone should volunteer to be immured in its walls for the fortress to stand. It ended up to be a young boy by the name of Zurab, his mother's only son, who was sealed within the fortification, and to this day, stories say that his mothers tears still drip from the section of wall into which he was entombed.
Algeria
The walls of the Algiers fort were built of concrete blocks made of lime and sand, rammed in a mold and exposed to dry in the sun. When baked thoroughly solid they were turned out of the mold and ready for use. Geronimo was a Christian who had served in a Spanish regiment. Captured by pirates he was turned over to the Dey of Algiers. In 1569, September 18th, Geronimo was put into one of the molds and the concrete rammed around him, and when the block had hardened, it was placed in the walls of the fort. After the occupation of Algiers by the French a subsidence in the wall led to an examination of the blocks. Subsequently the block was removed ( December 27, 1853), in order to make room for a new fort. When this block of concrete was exploded it was found to contain a skeleton of a human body, the whole of which was visible from the neck to the knees, in a perfect state of preservation. The cast of the head, the remains, and the block of broken pise are now preserved in the Cathedral of Algiers.
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies...
India
When Rajah Sala Byne was building the fort of Sialkot in the Punjab, the foundation of the south-east bastian gave way so repeatedly that he had recourse to a soothsayer, who assured him that it would never stand until the blood of an only son was shed there, wherefore the only son of a widow was sacrificed.
You can read more about this in Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophi, religion, art and custom...
William Crooke's The Popular Religion and Folk-Lore of Northern India records traditions in which buildings, bridges and forts required human victims.
One example concerns a bridge over the Jargo River at Chunâr:
When the bridge repeatedly fell, a Brahman girl was supposedly sacrificed to the local deity. Her ghost then became the local Marī and was worshipped in times of trouble.
Crooke also records the belief that if a castle would not stand, or a pond would not retain water, a human victim could be offered.
Japan
Hitobashira (人柱, "human pillar"), was a human sacrifice formerly practised in Japan. A person was buried alive under large buildings like dams, bridges and castles, to protect them from being destroyed by natural disasters or by enemy attacks...
The legend about the Maruoka Castle, located in Fukui Prefecture, says that its stone wall kept crumbling. A poor one-eyed woman named Oshizu was buried alive under the central pillar after bargaining for her son to become a samurai, a promise the lords later failed to keep. Locals still blame the spring rains on her sorrowful tears...
China
Archaeological records confirm that foundational human sacrifices—sacrifices made during the construction of city walls, gates, and major buildings—did occur in ancient China, dating back to the late Neolithic period.
At the Shimao archaeological site in Shaanxi province (dating around 2300–1800 BCE, late Neolithic), excavators discovered pits containing roughly 80 human skulls ritually buried directly beneath the outer city's eastern wall. Forensic analyses indicate these victims were primarily teenage girls, likely captured or conscripted from neighboring groups during the fortress's monumental construction.
You can read more about this in this article...
During the later Shang dynasty (c. 1600–1046 BCE), oracle bones explicitly document thousands of sacrificial victims offered not only for royal funerals (renxun) but also for architectural rites (jianzu), dedicating new halls, altars, and ramparts.
You can read more about this in this article...
Borneo / Dayak
There was a tradition among the Milanau Dayaks of Borneo in which, when erecting a large house, a hole was dug for the first post and a slave girl was placed in it. The enormous post was then released so that it crushed her, making her the sacrifice associated with the principal structural support.
You can read more about this in Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophi, religion, art and custom...
Polynesia
At Maeva, on the island of Raiatea, the central pillar of a marae temple was reportedly erected over the body of a human victim.
You can read more about this in Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophi, religion, art and custom...
You can read more about marae temples in these articles: 1, 2
Thailand
It was formerly a custom in Siam, when a new city gate was to be erected, for public officers to seize the first persons that passed by, who were then buried alive under the gate-posts to serve as guardian spirits of the city.
The belief was that a violent, sudden death would create a highly territorial, ferocious guardian spirit (Chao Thi) bound to the structure to ward off enemies and evil forces...
The earliest and most authoritative written text documenting this practice is the 1630s chronicle by Jeremias Van Vliet, a Dutch merchant who worked for the Dutch East India Company in the old capital.
Van Vliet recorded that when King Prasat Thong rebuilt or repaired the massive fortified walls and city gates of the Royal Palace of Ayutthaya, he ordered his officials to violently seize pregnant women.
According to his journals, the women were thrown into the muddy pits underneath the gate posts, and the heavy structural pillars were dropped directly on top of them.
You can read more about this in Foundational rites with some kindred ceremonies and in Death at the Building Site: Construction Sacrifice in Southeast Asia...
So that is all I have to say about foundational human sacrifices from around the world...For now. I hope you found this article interesting...
