Showing posts with label Croatian archaeology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Croatian archaeology. Show all posts

Thursday, 1 April 2021

Lugus or Triglav

Two years ago I posted this picture 

Three headed Idol from Vaćani, Dalmatia, Croatia, probably represented Slavic god Triglav (Three headed, Trimurti) who was identified with Dabog, the supreme god of the Serbs. Similar ancient stone head was found in Ireland. I talked about it in my post "Triglav"...


Then yesterday I came across this article by Anne Ross: "A pagan tricephalos from Netherton, Lanarkshire"...And in it, she talks about three almost identical idols presumed to be Celtic...

The first one was found in Netherton, North Lanarkshire, Scotland



The second one was found in Marne valley, France


The third was found in Raphoe, County Donegal, Ireland. 

And according to the author, the Irish legends about the stone point to the possibility that it could depict the Celtic god Lugus, who was "one of three brothers" all called the same, basically Triglav (tricephalos)...

So is the idol from Croatia Celtic too? And what is the relationship between Lugus and Triglav?


Wednesday, 22 July 2020

Nakovana

This is the abandoned Nakovana village located near the tip of the Pelješac Peninsula in Southern Dalmatia, Croatia...



The name Nakovana is related to the Slavic word "nakovanj", meaning "anvil", most likely because of the shape of this nearby hill. It is known today locally as Grad (City), because of the ruins of a huge Illyrian fortress which once stood on its top...


The fortress was destroyed during the Octavian's Illyrian campaign which lasted 8 years, from 35 to 27 BC, and encompassed almost the entire eastern Adriatic and much of its hinterland...

During the first year of operations, the Roman army massacred the native populations of the islands of Korčula and Mljet. Historical sources do not say whether the Illyrians on the Pelješac peninsula met the same faith...

But the archaeological survey of the region found virtually no traces of occupation during the Early Imperial or Late Roman periods. This is an unusual situation in Dalmatia, where those periods often account for the bulk of archaeological remains...

Most likely, the conquering Romans could not tolerate a native stronghold at such a key strategic position and they most likely destroyed it and turned the surrounding area into a wasteland. The local population was either exterminated or expelled...

How important Nakovana fort was during the Illyrian times can be seen from the fact that over 50 stone tumuli (cairns) are strewn over the fields surrounding the fort. Like the one on this picture shown with the Grad fortress in the background...


These are burials of important people, most likely the aristocracy of the era and the time - the people who built and lived in the Grad fortress. None of the tumuli have been excavated so far...

You have probably never heard of Nakovana before...Unless you are an archaeologist with an interest in Dalmatian prehistory...But you should have. And the fact that Nakovana is not famous world wide beggars belief...

The reason why Nakovana should be famous is not because of its Illyrian fortress and its tumuli...It is because of this cave that lies near the fortress. 


It is the same cave I talked about in my article about the Neolithic maritime trade...


The reason why Nakovana should be famous is not (just) because the lithics found in the cave's front chamber are the proof of the maritime trade network which existed for thousands of years in the South of the Adriatic Sea...

The reason why Nakovana should be famous was discovered in the cave's second chamber which was deliberately sealed, probably immediately before or after the Illyrian fortress Grad was destroyed by the Romans...


This is how the archaeologists who discovered this hidden chamber described the event:


And what they discovered in the hidden chamber is this: A large gleaming white stalagmite in a shape of a phallus...



The stalagmite sits on top of a series of superimposed prehistoric layers, the earliest being from Early Copper Age and dated to the mid-fourth millennium BC. A direct radiocarbon date on the base of the stalagmite suggests that it began to grow about 3600 years ago...


The floor of the chamber was strewn with broken high quality pottery, mostly drinking cups, mostly imported and mostly Greek, broken and deposited there as sacrifice...


The fact that the pottery was Greek made, doesn't mean that Greeks deposited there. Some of the cairns surrounding the Grad fortress, were looted in the past. What remains in and around them shows that the character of the funerary rite is unquestionably Illyrian...

The people were buried with locally made Iron Age jewellery, handmade pottery, and fairly often, fragments of fine Hellenistic ceramic vessels, identical to those from the cave...

Illyrians were famous maritime traders and pirates and they pretty much controlled the southern Adriatic for hundreds of years...

And the Nakovana Grad fortress controlled one of the most strategically important points, the entrance into the Neretva river which was the entrance into the Balkan hinterland...


Which is the reason why the Romans eventually wiped them out...

By the way, were Illyrians the descendants of the people who controlled the Southern Adriatic since Neolithic??? Just putting this out there for people to think about it...

The broken pottery was deposited around the stalagmite, showing that it was the centre of the cultic activities in the cave. The earliest pottery shards deposited next to the stalagmite date to the 4th century BC, around the time of the Alexander the Great...

Now this is very very interesting...

If I didn't tell you where this cave was, you would be forgiven to think that this was a Siva lingam cave temple located somewhere in India...

I wonder if this Illyrian sanctuary predates or postdates Alexander's Indian campaign and who was celebrated in a shape of a lingam in this cave???

The archaeologists who excavated the cave say Silvanus, Pan...

Hmm...Possibly...

Believe or not, as impressive as this phallus looks like :)  this is not the most amazing thing found in the hidden chamber of the Nakovana cave...The most amazing thing was found among the rubble deposited around it...

Among hundreds of pottery shards, archaeologists have also found several pieces of ivory with engraved astrological signs, which once formed part of an astrologer's horoscope board...The oldest so far found horoscope in the world...









I am here talking about Greek horoscopic astrology, which is believed to have been invented in late Ptolemaic Egypt, in the 2nd or early 1st c. BC...

Now we know that the Nakovana cave was sealed around 35BC. So the horoscope board deposited next to the stalagmite must have been made before that. Radiocarbon dating actually points to much earlier date...

The age obtained by the accelerator mass spectrometry is 2217±21 B.P. The calibrated range of two standard deviations is the period between 375 and 204 BC, with an asymmetrical probability distribution leaning towards the 3rd c. BC...

In plain English, the animal from which the ivory was obtained was killed in the 3rd century BC...

Archaeologists who discovered this amazing artefact say: "It is believed horoscope was invented in Egypt, late 2nd, early 1st c. BC. Therefore, the Nakovana zodiac could not have been made before the 2nd c. BC (probably not much before 100 BC), meaning that the ivory used to make it was at least hundred years old"...

Now I don't know for how long a piece of ivory is usually left lying around before it is cut and carved into sellable objects, but I don't think it was left to "age" for over 100 years...

Why playing it down? "It is believed (!!!) that horoscope was invented in Egypt in late 2nd, early 1st c. BC"...What if it wasn't? What if it was invented somewhere else? Earlier? And brought to Egypt from there?


I have been writing about zodiac for a while...One of the things that I have discovered is that zodiac signs, as they are positioned in this "Ptolemaic Greek zodiac" mark the annual lifecycle events of the depicted animals in Europe. You can read about this in this series of articles about Zodiac signs (work in progress)...

As if someone observed the significant annual behavior (mating and birthing) of the animals in Europe, and derived the zodiac signs from that behavior: Pisces - mating season of Europan salmon, Cancer - mating season of Atlantic crabs and European crayfish, Taurus - calving season of European Aurochs...

By the way, I am here talking about the horoscope zodiac circle the way we know it today. Not animal solar calendar markers found in many cultures in Eurasia and North Africa over last 10,000 years. I wrote about those extensively too. You can read about this in this series of articles about Solar calendar markers (work in progress)...

Do you see now why I think that it is completely unbelievable that Nakovana is not a famous archaeological site? 

Sources

Text and images:

Tuesday, 21 July 2020

Neolithic seafarers

This is Pelješac peninsula on Croatia’s Dalmatian coast. 


In one of the caves near the tip of the peninsula, archaeologists have discovered prehistoric cultural deposits, about 4 meters thick, covering the entire local post-Mesolithic sequence...

Eleven occupation phases and sub phases span 6,000 years, from the Early Neolithic to the Illyrian Iron Age...

You can read about the lithic finds from Pelješac peninsula in the article "Lithic artifacts from nakovana (Pelješac): Continuity and change from early neolithic until the end of prehistory" by S. Forenbaher and Zlatko Perhoč

Among many lithics found in the cave, a few were made from glossy and semi-translucent black obsidian...
The analysis of the obsidian has determined that it came from the Gabellotto Gorge area of the island of Lipari, just above Sicily...


This in itself is amazing...How the hell did Lipari obsidian end up on Pelješac in Neolithic??? But there is more...All other lithics from the cave were made of non local cherts...


The analysis of the material showed that it came from the mines located in Gargano Peninsula in Apulia region. 


Most of the blades were imported from Gargano as finished products...And it seems that the inhabitants of Southern Dalmatia continued acquiring chert tools from the Gargano peninsula for over five thousand years, from Early Neolithic until Late Bronze Age, if not even later. This is quite astonishing...It points to the existence of a highly developed lithic industry which produced enough stone tools for both local and oversees market....

How were stone tools from Lipari and Gargano transported to Dalmatia? Everything points to a well established long running maritime trade route between Sicily, Apulia and Dalmatia...

Ernestine S. Elster from the University of California, Los Angeles talks about the possibility of the existence of a Neolithic "network of seamen and miners" in her article "Scaloria Cave: Found, Lost, and Found Again", about Scaloria Cave located near the Gargano chert mines.

She says that it was this "network" which "brought Gargano flint to Scaloria and the Tavoliere in Apulia and further afield, to the Adriatic Tremiti island of San Domino and the island of Hvar in Dalmatia". We now know that this trade route went further south east to Pelješac peninsula...

How far south east did this trade network reach? Well at least as far south east as the source of the coarse impressed wares from the Early Greek Neolithic sites, which were found in Apulian Neolithic sites...


Who ran this maritime trade network during Neolithic and Chalcolithic? Who were these Neolithic seafarers? 

Not everyone can make sea going vessels and not everyone can successfully sail these vessels across the sea and back...Both of these skills are highly complex and usually passed through families, clans, tribes which is why, by the time we end up in the Bronze Age, we have seafaring nations...

Whoever they were, their trading network covered not just the seas east of Sicily, but also the seas west of Sicily...

How do we know this? Because of the fact that at the same time when chert from Gargano and obsidian from Lipari were traded in Dalmatia, amber from Sicily was traded in Spain...



Also in the article "Sardinian Obsidian Circulation and Early Maritime Navigation in the Neolithic as Shown Through Social Network Analysis" Kyle Freund and Zack Batist also talk about developed mining/seafaring network which produced and transported obsidian from Sardinia to Italy and France where it was exchanged ("sold"???) for thousands of years, between the 6th and 4th millennium BC...


The same guys?
 
There is a high possibility that here we are talking about highly specialised mining and maritime trading societies who worked for profit...Although what they could have exchanged their stones and amber for is a big question...

What is really important is that here we now have a trade network which covered the North Mediterranean during Neolithic, Copper, Bronze and Iron age, connecting Balkans, Sicily and Iberia...And predating Phoenicians and Minoans by few thousand years...

In my series of articles about Montenegrine tumuli, I showed that archaeological finds from both Montenegro (just south of Pelješac peninsula) and Ireland, point at a strange link between Copper age Montenegro and Ireland, and indicate that the copper age could have been brought to Ireland by people who arrived there from Montenegro...


And guess what: the Irish legends, which were first time written down during early medieval time, say that the first farmers, miners and metalworkers arrived to Ireland by sea from the Balkans, via Sicily and Iberia...

This voyage, according to the Irish Annals, took place during the 3rd millennium BC...Of course every historian and archaeologist in the world dismissed these legends as "pseudo history"...No one was able for such maritime voyage at that time...Hmmm.....